Posts Tagged ‘Fit to Tender’

A Quarter of UK Government Contracts to be Awarded to Small Businesses!

July 23rd, 2010 by Tony Zemaitis | 3 Comments | Filed in PQQ, Public Sector Tenders, Tenders

Vince Cable, Business Secretary, says that a quarter of public sector contracts are to go to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Government recognises that small businesses struggle with existing government procurement processes (including documentation and other requirements / qualifications / accreditations).

He said: “Our policy is to ensure that 25 per cent of public procurement goes to the small business sector. We need to give access through small-scale procurement.”

We have seen blatant discrimination against SMEs by some public sector organisations (eg discriminating specifically on size: requiring that a contract must not represent more than 8% of your turnover)… not to mention the requirement to have so many policies / accreditations and the ability to answer very complex questions on business management.

So it will be interesting to see how this works out.

Your views, experiences and coments are most welcome.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , ,

UK Public Sector to Flag Contract Opportunities that are Suitable for SMEs

April 12th, 2010 by Tony Zemaitis | No Comments | Filed in PQQ, Public Sector Tenders, Tenders

“Tendering opportunities thought especially suitable for SMEs or consortia of SMEs should be flagged by the procurer during the advertising process.”

This was a key recommendation in “Accelerating the SME Economic Engine” (The Glover Report).

The OGC has now published Small Supplier Big Opportunity / Flagging your Contracts to SMEs which asks public sector procurement to follow this by flagging opportunities deemed suitable for SMEs.

Reasons for SME flagging will include:

  • Strong SME market presence
  • Low contract value / volume
  • Innovative solutions
  • Tailored product / service
  • Local delivery
  • Limited scales economies
  • Unregulated market

It’ll be interesting to see how it works.

Please post any thoughts or experience of this.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tenders and PQQs – Most Common Mistakes

June 17th, 2009 by Tony Zemaitis | No Comments | Filed in Bid Writing, PQQ, Public Sector Tenders, Tenders

When trying to write good tender / PQQ / RFP responses, a good starting point is to understand what are the most common mistakes – you can then make sure you avoid them!

In no particular order:

Incorrect cost schedules
You normally have to complete a pricing template; this makes it easier for the buyers to compare the various submissions. If you get it wrong, your prices may not accepted or marked properly

Incorrect formatting, presentation & non-conformance
A bit like the last one, if you don’t follow their format, you can get marked down.

Missing info eg appendices
Simply put, if something is missing it cannot get marked! Sometimes you may get a second chance to provide whatever is missing but it’s unlikely.

Late submissions
This will almost certainly get your bid disqualified!

Incorrect number of copies supplied
It’s common to be asked to submit multiple copies; sometimes different versions eg some without pricing. This enables the bid to be distributed to various members of the procurement team for marking. If you haven’t produced enough, you will have either made it hard work for the customer OR given them a reason not to mark everything (and lose points on your score).

Questions missed / not answered
A question not answered cannot get any score except zero.

Not understanding questions – incorrect assumptions
It’s not unusual for questions to be ambiguous so don’t assume… find out what the question means. This way you will be certain to answer what is being asked – not what you think is being asked. If you still don’t know how to answer it, try and get help.

Wrong company name
If you plagiarise ie cut & paste, make sure you edit to change the name of your customer. It does not look good if you are bidding for someone’s business but show another organisation’s name!

Typos / grammar
While you are not being marked on your command of the English language, when you are bidding for a major contract you must give the buyers confidence that yours is a professional organisation

Lack of understanding of customer’s business
You need to demonstrate that you know what their problems are or what they are trying to achieve. Avoid bland generic submissions that don’t show understanding. Worse still, do not just cut and paste a previous answer without personalising / editing it.

There are three basic themes here:

  1. trying not to lose marks
  2. showing a professional image
  3. making your submission relevant.

There are many more things to watch for but please do avoid these!

If you have any more ideas or comments, please add them…

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Fit to Tender Checklist

May 1st, 2009 by Tony Zemaitis | No Comments | Filed in PQQ, Public Sector Tenders, Tenders

Every day we get calls from business owners wanting to grow their business and asking what’s involved in tendering.

This is why we created the Fit to Tender Checklist.

You can quickly see what tendering for major contracts is about and how to start qualifying ie whether it’s a realistic opportunity for you – are you likely to get through the PQQ (pre-qualification questionnaire) and win the ITT (invitation to tender) stage?

Although the prize is fantastic when you win a big tender, often there’s only one winner (and so, many losers) therefore you need to go into the tendering process being fully aware of what’s involved.

The Fit to Tender Checklist isn’t meant to be exhaustive but it should give you a good idea of what lies ahead. Nevertheless, all suggestions are welcome…


  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , ,